Türk Ahşap Konut Mimarisi - 17.19. Yüzyıllar e-kitap
Türk Ahşap Konut Mimarisi - 17.19. Yüzyıllar PDF ve diğer formatlarda e-Kitap
Mekân ile insan arasındaki ilişkinin öncül ve en özel ürünü olan “ev”, mimarlık alanının sınırlarını çoktan aşarak geniş bir disiplinler alanının göstergesi olarak benimsenmiştir. “Türk evi” ise tüm çeşitliliğine, geniş bir tarihi ve coğrafi alanı kapsamış olmasına rağmen ancak 20. yüzyıldan itibaren araştırma konusu olmuştur. Türk konut geleneği, temel düzenini ve öğelerin yerleşimindeki özgünlüğünü yüzyılarca korumuştur. Oda mekânının kökeninde, göçer geleneklerinin varoluş biçimi yatar; yaşam ve form iç içe geçer. Göçer pragmatizm ve İslam soyutlamasının örtüşmesiyle zenginleşen bu konut, AnadoluTürk toplumunun yerel özeliklerini de yansıtır. 16. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında Osmanlı egemenliğinin sağlamlaşmasıyla doruk noktasına ulaşarak “hayatlı ev”de özgün ifadesini bulur. Türk evi, beş yüz yıldır seyahatnamelere, gravür ve resimlere konu edilerek betimlenmiş olmasına karşın özelikle ahşap olan yapı malzemelerinin kısıtlı ömrü, bu mimariyi tüm detaylarıyla inceleyecek yeterlilikte veri bırakmamıştır. Türk ahşap konut mimarisinin, kapsamlı bir tarih araştırması ve derinlemesine bir kuramsal yaklaşımla değerlendirilmeye çalışıldığı bu kitapla, evrensel mimarlık tarihinde hak etiği konuma ve değere ulaşmasını diliyoruz.
: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları
Kitap eleştirileri
Türk Ahşap Konut Mimarisi - 17.19. Yüzyıllar
rima-el-rifai
Arempula, Telangana, Hindistan
The single most read book by people contemplating law school. There are clear pros and cons to this. On the pro side, Turow is a good writer who structures even this supposed transcript of his memoir with a fair amount of novelistic suspense. Our hero must confront good and evil personified by his various professors (seriously, there are times when you'd think you were reading Harry Potter). Ultimately, as in a good modern novel, he must face the true nemesis that lies within (his capacity to cross over to the dark side and become an evil lawyer). Beyond entertainment, it does gently introduce the reader to the basic scene of law school with many of its organizing concepts (the curriculum, the socratic method, moot court, exam structure, etc.) and regalia (hornbooks, briefs, outlines). However, I've already heard (and believe me, I haven't been looking all that hard) much reaction to this book as painting a fairly extreme picture of Law School that just doesn't accurately describe most of the contemporary reality. Like "The Paper Chase" (the film most recommended to would-be law students), it is set in the sacred halls of Harvard Law School, where a very particular prestige-borne madness prevails. More fundamentally, it was written 30 years ago, and at a time Turow himself acknowledges as one of tense generational conflict. He suggests that it was in the wake of Watergate that lawyers suddenly took a massive plunge in the estimation of their fellow Americans, such that even beginning law students were anxious not to replicate the degraded culture of their predecessors. Inevitably, this generated a lot of conflict with the professoriate, which appears in Turow's book as deeply divided between conservative old guard who considered humiliation a basic teaching tool and younger faculty who fashioned themselves progressives. The kind of politicization of the classroom that added considerably to Turow's anxiety and self-doubt was a product of the times. I'm sure there are new campus politics now, but not the ones depicted in "One L." Above all, the general consensus I've seen is that Law School is just not so traumatic anymore. Which is not to say that the madness over prestige, getting top grades, making law review and all the rest have gone away. After all, those things have an economic basis in the corporate law firms themselves. Maybe this recession will change the field somehow...
2023-01-27 04:39